GORMAN v. CHIEF OF POLICE FOR CITY OF BOONE, NC et al
MICHAEL P. GORMAN |
CHIEF OF POLICE FOR CITY OF PINEHURST, NC, CHIEF OF POLICE FOR CITY OF GREENSBORO, NC, CHIEF OF POLICE FOR CITY OF BOONE, NC and CHIEF OF POLICE FOR CITY OF SOUTHERN PINES, NC |
1:2013cv00647 |
August 5, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Moore |
L. PATRICK AULD |
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR. on 3/25/2014 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 5 ; that this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered c ontemporaneously with this Order. FURTHER that Plaintiff's Motion for Calendar Adjustment to Medical Treatments (Doc. 8 ) is DENIED. FURTHER that Plaintiff's Motion for Damages for Hate Crime (Doc. 9 ) is DENIED. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 09/17/2013; that Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit/Declaration in Support (Docket Entry 1 ) is GRANTED FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF ALLOWING THE COURT TO CONSIDER A RECOMMENDATION OF DISMISSAL. RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). (Garland, Leah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.