MILLSAPS v. SMITH

MILLSAPS v. SMITH

Petitioner:	MARVIN W. MILLSAPS
Respondent:	LEWIS SMITH
Case Number:	1:2013cv01017
Filed:	November 14, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Alamance
Presiding Judge:	JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE
Presiding Judge:	N. C. TILLEY
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 22, 2016	Filing 12 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 04/22/2016, that the Recommendation [Doc. # 3 ] that the case be transferred to the Western District of North Carolina is withdrawn. F URTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is instructed to send Petitioner § 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)). RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited above. (Taylor, Abby)
December 19, 2013	Filing 3 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 12/19/2013, that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of filing this action and entering this Order and Recommendatio n. RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and that the entire record of this proceeding be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina for further screening and/or further proceedings.(Taylor, Abby)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 22, 2016

Filing 12 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 04/22/2016, that the Recommendation [Doc. # 3 ] that the case be transferred to the Western District of North Carolina is withdrawn. F URTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is instructed to send Petitioner § 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)). RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited above. (Taylor, Abby)

December 19, 2013

Filing 3 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 12/19/2013, that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of filing this action and entering this Order and Recommendatio n. RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and that the entire record of this proceeding be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina for further screening and/or further proceedings.(Taylor, Abby)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MILLSAPS v. SMITH
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: MARVIN W. MILLSAPS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: LEWIS SMITH
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?