GOLDEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

GOLDEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Petitioner:	STEVEN WAYNE GOLDEN
Respondent:	STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case Number:	1:2014cv00129
Filed:	February 11, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Randolph
Presiding Judge:	L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge:	THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 3, 2015	Filing 20 ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 2/3/2015 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 14 ; that Petitioner Golden's motion for voluntary dismissal (Doc. 16 ) is DENIED. FURTHER that Respondent's motion fo r summary judgment (Doc. 5 ) be GRANTED and that the petition (Doc. 2 ) and this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. (Sheets, Jamie)
December 31, 2014	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 12/31/2014. RECOMMENDED that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 5 ) be granted, that the Petition (Docket Entry 2 ) be dismissed, and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action. ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket Entry 10 ) is DENIED. re 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by STEVEN WAYNE GOLDEN, RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Butler, Carol)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 3, 2015

Filing 20 ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 2/3/2015 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 14 ; that Petitioner Golden's motion for voluntary dismissal (Doc. 16 ) is DENIED. FURTHER that Respondent's motion fo r summary judgment (Doc. 5 ) be GRANTED and that the petition (Doc. 2 ) and this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. (Sheets, Jamie)

December 31, 2014

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 12/31/2014. RECOMMENDED that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 5 ) be granted, that the Petition (Docket Entry 2 ) be dismissed, and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action. ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket Entry 10 ) is DENIED. re 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by STEVEN WAYNE GOLDEN, RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Butler, Carol)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GOLDEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: STEVEN WAYNE GOLDEN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Represented By:	CLARENCE JOE DELFORGE, III
Represented By:	JESS D. MEKEEL
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?