TROUTMAN v. W.R. BERKLEY CORPORATION, et al
| MARJORIE TROUTMAN |
| W.R. BERKLEY CORPORATION doing business as KEY RISK also known as KEY RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. also known as KEY RISK INSURANCE COMPANY, KEY RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., KEY RISK INSURANCE COMPANY and PATRICIA JANKE |
| 1:2014cv00131 |
| February 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Guilford |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case with Prejudice by PATRICIA JANKE, W.R. BERKLEY CORPORATION. (CROSBY, MARY) |
Filing 10
ORDER Appointing KENNETH P. CARLSON, JR., as the mediator nunc pro tunc. As Mr. Carlson has conferred with the parties and submitted a Report of Mediator to the Clerk pursuant to LR 83.9f, no further action is required of Mr. Carlson. (Gammon, Cheryl)
|
| Case Reported Settled at Mediation (Gammon, Cheryl) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Stipulation of Dismissal due by 5/14/2014. (Solomon, Dianne) |
| Case Reported Settled by Angela Gray, Esq. Stipulation of Dismissal due by 5/14/2014. (Solomon, Dianne) |
| Motions Submitted: #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Partial) to JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER- (Solomon, Dianne) |
| Filing 9 Letter re: response to #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Partial) (Solomon, Dianne) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Response due by 4/4/2014. (Solomon, Dianne) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Right to Consent. (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant PATRICIA JANKE, W.R. BERKLEY CORPORATION, filed by MARJORIE TROUTMAN. (State Court document filed in Guilford County Superior Court, case number 13CVS10705, listed as Exhibit A to the Petition for Removal) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to PATRICIA JANKE, W.R. BERKLEY CORPORATION. (State Court document filed in Guilford County Superior Court, case number 13CVS10705, issued 01/13/2014, listed as Exhibit B to the Petition for Removal) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MARJORIE TROUTMAN. (State Court document filed in Guilford County Superior Court, case number 13CVS10705, listed as Exhibit A to the Petition for Removal) (Garland, Leah) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM filed by Defendants PATRICIA JANKE, W.R. BERKLEY CORPORATION re #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Partial) in Support of filed by PATRICIA JANKE, W.R. BERKLEY CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Unpublished Decisions)(CROSBY, MARY) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Partial) by PATRICIA JANKE, W.R. BERKLEY CORPORATION. Responses due by 3/10/2014 (CROSBY, MARY) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by W.R. BERKLEY CORPORATION. (CROSBY, MARY) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, Guilford County, case number 13-cvs-10705. Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-1457320, filed by W.R. BERKLEY CORPORATION, PATRICIA JANKE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: State Court documents 13-cvs-10705, #2 Exhibit A1: Civil Summons 13-cvs-10705)(CROSBY, MARY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
