BENNETT v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, (OPM) et al
| LINDA M. BENNETT |
| OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, (OPM), OFFICE OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEE'S GROUP LIFE INSURANCE, (OFEGLI) and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (METLIFE) |
| 1:2014cv00137 |
| February 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| UNASSIGNED |
| JOE L. WEBSTER |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 12/21/2015; that the Defendant's motion to dismiss under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(h)(3) for lack of jurisdiction (Docket Entry 54 ) be GRANTED. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that all other pending motions (Docket Entries 43 , 44 , 51 , 53 ) be DISMISSED as moot. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 12/15/2014; that Defendant OPM's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 14 ] be GRANTED. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 10/22/2014 as set out herein. RECOMMENDED that the court GRANT Defendant's motion to dismiss (Docket Entry 14 ) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.(Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
