GREENE v. COUNTY OF DURHAM OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
ALONZO GREENE |
COUNTY OF DURHAM OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, WORTH L. HILLS, MINOR, JOHNSON, JONES, HOLLOWAY, JOHN DOE, COLLIER, ROME/ROWE, MOORE, S. L. BROWN and P. BUTLER, R.N. |
1:2014cv00153 |
February 21, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Durham |
CATHERINE C. EAGLES |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 125 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 8/26/2016; that the defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law, (Doc. 95 ), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as stated herein. The plaintiff Alonzo Greene's motion in limine, (Doc. 99 ), is DENIED as premature, without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to set this matter for trial. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 10/28/2014; that the motion to dismiss, (Doc. 11 ), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The plaintiff's claims against former Sheriff Hill in all capacities, Sheriff Andrews in all capacities, the Office of the Sheriff, and Defendants Minor, Johnson, Jones, Holloway, Collier, Rome, Moore, and Brown in their official capacities are DISMISSED. The claims against Defendants Minor, Johnson, Jones, Holloway, Collier, Rome, Moore, and Brown in their individual capacities may proceed. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.