BOBADILLA v. CORDERO
Petitioner: ROSA RAMOS BOBADILLA
Respondent: JOSE DE JESUS SOSA CORDERO
Case Number: 1:2014cv00205
Filed: March 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: CATHERINE C. EAGLES
Presiding Judge: JOE L. WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 11603
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES, that the petition (Doc. 2 ), is GRANTED. Judgment will be entered concomitantly herewith. (Daniel, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOBADILLA v. CORDERO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JOSE DE JESUS SOSA CORDERO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ROSA RAMOS BOBADILLA
Represented By: AMY ANNE VUKOVICH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?