BELTON v. COLVIN
SHARI LYNN BELTON |
CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
1:2014cv00777 |
September 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Durham |
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER |
JOE L. WEBSTER |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 09/29/2015, that the court therefore ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and that Plaintiff's motion for judgment reversing the Commissioner (Doc. 6 ) is DENIED, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 10 ) is GRANTED, the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATIONOF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 08/24/2015. After a careful consideration of the evidence of record, the Court finds that the Commissioner's decision is suppor ted by substantial evidence. Accordingly, this Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Reversing Commissioner (Docket Entry 6 ) be DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 10 ) be GRANTED and the final decision of the Commissioner be upheld.(Taylor, Abby) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.