MANN V. WINSTON-SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY ET AL
Plaintiff: MELISSA J. MANN
Defendant: WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY and JANICE SMITH
Case Number: 1:2014cv01054
Filed: December 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Forsyth
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM L. OSTEEN
Presiding Judge: JOE L. WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 126 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. on 7/21/2017, that Winston-Salem State University's Motion and Substitute Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 59 , 91 ) are GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED. A judgment in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion and Order will be entered contemporaneously herewith.(Daniel, J)
September 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. on 9/14/2015. Defendant Winston-Salem State University's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12 ) and Defendant Janice Smith's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b) (6) (Doc. 19 ) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: (1) Plaintiff's first and second claims asserting Title VII claims against Defendant Smith are DISMISSED; (2) Plaintiff's third and fourth causes of action u nder § 1981 and § 1983 against Defendant WSSU are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All other requested forms of relief in Defendants' motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Further ORDERED, that Plaintiff's claims f or (1) Hostile Work Environment and Wrongful Discharge in Violation of North Carolina Public Policy; (2) Negligent Retention and Supervision; and (3) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE at Plaintiff 9;s request pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Doc. 16 ) is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend her complaint but must comply with the ter ms of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Plaintiff shall file her amended complaint within ten (10) days of the issuance of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. To avoid any confusion, the court directs that rather than filing the proposed amended complaint, Plaintiff file a new amended complaint that conforms to the terms of this Order. (Daniel, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MANN V. WINSTON-SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY ET AL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MELISSA J. MANN
Represented By: JOHN C. VERMITSKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JANICE SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?