MANNS v. COLVIN
| CHARLOTTA J. MANNS |
| CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2015cv00133 |
| February 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Forsyth |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| CATHERINE C. EAGLES |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 10/5/2015; that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is REVERSED, and that this action is remanded to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § ; 405(g). The Commissioner is directed to remand the matter to the ALJ for further consideration of (1) Ms. Manns' mental RFC, including an express discussion of the impact on the RFC of her moderate limitations in concentration, persistence, or pace, in accordance with Mascio; and (2) the opinions of treating psychiatrist Dr. McDonough, including an explicit discussion of the weight assigned to such opinions and the reasons for such weight in accordance with 20 C.F.R. §§ 4 04.1527(c), 416.927(c). FURTHER that Ms. Manns' Motion for Judgment Remanding the Cause for Hearing, (Doc. 10 ), is GRANTED, and that the Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, (Doc. 12 ), is DENIED. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
