HENSON SCALES v. WEBB et al
| MEG HENSON SCALES |
| CHAUNESTI WEBB and MANBITES DOG THEATER COMPANY |
| 1:2015cv00192 |
| March 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Durham |
| WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 06/05/2017, that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Lawsuit with Prejudice, and for Summary Judgment (Doc. 61 ) is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees & Costs Associated with Hearing Held Jan. 24, 2017 (Doc. 64 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to pay Defendants a total of $3,248.60 in fees and costs. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion and Supplem ental Motion for Use of Skype or Telephone for Scales v. Webb and Man Bites Dog Theater and Summary Judgment (Docs. 68 , 72 ) are DENIED as moot. A judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order will be entered contemporaneously herewith. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 03/30/2016. For the reasons set forth herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 23 ) is DENIED.(Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
