Mitchell v. Mitchell
LARRY RAY MITCHELL |
S. MITCHELL and B. WELLS |
1:2015cv00546 |
July 10, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
XX US, Outside State |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 10/30/2015 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, that this action be DISMISSED sua sponte WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Petitioner filing a new petition which corrects the defects of the current Petition, and that, finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 11 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 09/16/2015, that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instru cted to send Petitioner § 2254 forms, instructions, and a current application to proceed in forma pauperis. RECOMMENDED that this action be filed, but then dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition which corrects the defects of the current Petition. (Taylor, Abby) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.