LINDSAY v. GLICK et al
| THEODUS LINDSAY, JR. |
| WILLIAM GLICK, III, BRANDHORST, BARRINGER, CORDELIA MCBRIDE, EBONY RATLIFF, HILDRETH, HUNEYCUTT, ROBINSON, LOOKABILL, BRUTON, PARSONS, HARGRAVE, BRADFORD and MACRE CRIDER |
| 1:2015cv00596 |
| July 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Stanly |
| LORETTA C. BIGGS |
| JOE L. WEBSTER |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 10/25/2016,Plaintiff's Motion to Enter Plaintiff's Rebuttal Evidence into Court Records (D.E. 58 ), Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (D.E.[68 ]), Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsider Motion to Amend Complaint (D.E. 72 ), Plaintiff's Motion for Production of Documents and Things and Entry Upon Land for Inspection and Other Purposes to William Glick, III (D.E. 75 ), Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (D.E. 78 ), Plaintiff's Motion for Emergency no Contact Order by Defendants Locklear and Bond (D.E. 99 ), and Defendants' Motion to Deem Response Timely Filed (D.E. 103 ) are DENIED. Plaintiff's Motio n for an Order Extending Limitations of Length of Brief to Refile Partial Summary Judgments (D.E. 81 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff will be allowed to file a supplement to his current motion for partial summary judgment (D.E. 89 ), to make any other arguments, limited to 10 pages. Plaintiff will have 21 days to file this supplement and Defendant will have 21 days to file a response. Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoena (D.E. 48 )is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. Defendants shall pro duce documents specified in camera inspection to Plaintiff within 14 days of this order. Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Extending Limitations of Length of Brief in Opposition to Dispositive Motions (D.E. 94 ), and Plaintiff's Motion for Court to Intervene (D.E. 97 ) are DENIED as moot. Defendants respond to Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for a TRO and Preliminary injunction (D.E. 98 ). Defendants will have 14 days to respond of this order. (Daniel, J)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 06/22/2016 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation; that Plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment (ECF Nos. 54 , 60 ) be DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling a summary judgment motion at the close of discovery. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 05/26/2016; that Plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment (Docket Entries 54 , 60 ) be DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling a summary judgment motion at the close of discovery. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 04/22/2016; that Plaintiff's Motion (Docket Entry 32 ) be GRANTED. Additionally, the Court finds that, unless justice requires other wise, no amended or supplemental pleadings will be allowed going forward. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion entitled "Motion for Access to Photocopying and Notary Services" (Docket Entry 26 ) and Plaintiff's motio n entitled "Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Appointment of Counsel (D.E. 3 ) and Memorandum of Law in Support" (Docket Entry 50 ) are DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions (Docket Entries 33 , 45 , 46 ) be DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Second Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (Docket Entry 53 ) is GRANTED. Defendants shall have up to and including May 18, 2016, to respond to P laintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories and Request for Admissions and Second Request for Production of Documents. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoena (Docket Entry 48 ) by May 18, 2016. (Garland, Leah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
