BETTS v. ARMSTRONG, ET AL.
| AMY BETTS |
| STEPHEN BRETT ARMSTRONG, JASON PAYNE, LINDA ARMSTRONG, SHANNON BRUNSON, FAMILY COURT IN NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC, THE, MELINDA CROUCH, SUANNE BECHTEL, CHRISTINE FARRELL, ERIC COSTINE, MARK COSTINE, AMY BUSIC, LEANNE QUATTRUCCI, HEATHER HOUSER, RENEE ENNIS, JEAN DARBY, BRADLEY HONNOLD and TED SHAPACK |
| 1:2015cv00613 |
| July 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Cabarrus |
| JOE L. WEBSTER |
| N. C. TILLEY |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3731 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 4/27/2016 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 4 ; that this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER, signed on 10/22/2015. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's application to proceed in forma puaperis 1 is GRANTED for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Complaint be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
