CREE, INC., ET AL. V. MSI, LLC, ET AL.
| CREE, INC. and CREE HONG KONG, LIMITED |
| MSI, LLC and MSI LIGHTING, INC. |
| 1:2015cv00706 |
| August 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Durham |
| CATHERINE C. EAGLES |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
242
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 11/27/2017, that MSi Lighting, Inc.'s and MSi, LLC's Motion for a New Trial [Doc. # 195 ] is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that MSi Lighting, Inc.'s and MSi, LLC' ;s Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment [Doc. # 196 ] is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Cree, Inc.'s and Cree Hong Kong Limited's Motion for Leave to File a Surreply in Opposition to MSi's Motion for New Trial or to Amend Judgment [Doc. # 210 ] is GRANTED. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
214
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 11/07/2017, that MSi Lighting, Inc.'s and MSi, LLC's Motion for a New Trial [Doc. # 195 ] is DENIED. FURTHER that MSi Lighting, Inc.'s and MSi, LLC's Motion to Alte r or Amend the Judgment [Doc. # 196 ] is DENIED. FURTHER that Cree, Inc.'s and Cree Hong Kong Limited's Motion for Leave to File a Surreply in Opposition to MSi's Motion for New Trial or to Amend Judgment [Doc. # 210 ] is GRANTED. (Garland, Leah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
