M-TEK KIOSK, INC. V. CLAYTON, ET AL.
| M-TEK KIOSK, INC. |
| RYAN CLAYTON and JOHN W. GOSNELL |
| 1:2015cv00886 |
| October 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| N. C. TILLEY |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 03/22/2017, that M-Tek Kiosk, Inc.'s Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Ryan Clayton [Doc. # 44 ] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is granted as to compensat ory and punitive damages in the amount of $1,130,663.76, pre-judgment interest, and post-judgment interest. It is denied without prejudice as to attorneys' fees. FURTHER ORDERED that default judgment be entered against Ryan Clayton in the amount of $1,130,663.76; plus pre-judgment interest on $376,887.92 at a rate of eight percent per annum; plus post-judgment interest on $1,130,663.76 and the pre-judgment interest at a rate of 1.03 percent. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 05/23/2016, that Defendant John W. Gosnell's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint [Doc. # 26 ] be GRANTED. (Garland, Leah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
