MCCRAY v. COLVIN
ANDREA S. MCCRAY |
CAROLYN W. COLVIN and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
1:2015cv00951 |
November 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Hoke |
LORETTA C. BIGGS |
JOE L. WEBSTER |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 1/6/2017 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 14 ; that the Plaintiff's motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 9 ) is DENIED, that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 12 ) is GRANTED, that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATON OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 11/14/2016; the Court finds that the Commissioner's decision is supported by substantial evidence and was reached based upon a correct application of the relevant law. Accordingly, this Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 9 ) be DENIED, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 12 ) be GRANTED, and that the final decision of the Commissioner be upheld. (Garland, Leah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.