UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LONNEN et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| WAYNE C. LONNEN and KAREN A. LONNEN |
| 1:2015mc00044 |
| July 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 12/18/2015; that the Government's Petition to Enforce IRS Summonses (Docket Entry 1 ) be GRANTED and that an Order be en tered compelling Respondents Wayne C. Lannen and Karen A. Lannen to obey the Internal Service Summons served on both parties, by producing all books, records, papers, and other data that are demanded by the summons and that are in his possession, cus tody, or control, within 45 days of the date of this Order. FURTHER that Respondents obey and fully comply with the IRS summonses at issue in this proceeding by contacting IRS Revenue Officer Karl D. Weeman, or any other person designated by t he IRS, to schedule both interviews at a mutually agreeable time, as set out herein. ORDERED that the United States Marshal for this District serve a copy of this Order personally upon Wayne C. Lonnen and Karen A. Lonnen, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order and Recommendation. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
