FERRELLGAS, L.P. et al v. BEST CHOICE PRODUCTS
| FERRELLGAS, L.P. and BLUE RHINO GLOBAL SOURCING, INC. |
| BEST CHOICE PRODUCTS |
| 1:2016cv00259 |
| March 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Forsyth |
| LORETTA C. BIGGS |
| JOE L. WEBSTER |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 06/08/2018, that Defendant's Motion to Amend Judgment, (ECF No. 55 ), is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Stay, (ECF No. 56 ), is DENIED AS MOOT. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 07/24/2017. An Order and Judgment dismissing this action with prejudice shall be entered upon the conclusion of all matters before the Court, including entry of the Order for sanctions as outlined herein. (Coyne, Michelle) Modified on 7/24/2017 (Coyne, Michelle).
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER ON 08/30/2016. Plaintiff's motion 18 is GRANTED. Defendant's Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Affirmative Defenses are STRICKEN. Defendant shall be permitted to amend its answer if leave is sought within fourteen days of this Order. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
