LOSTUTTER v. OLSEN et al
Plaintiff: |
DERIC JAMES LOSTUTTER |
Defendant: |
THOMAS OLSEN, ALEXANDRIA GODDARD and MICHELLE MCKEE |
Case Number: |
1:2016cv01098 |
Filed: |
September 2, 2016 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
Office: |
NCMD Office |
County: |
Forsyth |
Presiding Judge: |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
Presiding Judge: |
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER |
Nature of Suit: |
Assault, Libel, and Slander |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
August 24, 2017 |
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 8/24/2017. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Doc. 13) is DENIED; Defendant Olsen's motion to dismiss bas ed on insufficient service of process (Doc. 13) is GRANTED, and the action against him is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Defendant Goddard's motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) based on insufficient service of process and lack of personal jurisdiction is DENIED, the motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted is GRANTED as to Counts I through IV and DENIED as to Counts V and VI; Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (Doc. 32) is GRANTED; Plaintiff& #039;s motion to strike (Doc. 29) is DENIED AS MOOT; Defendant McKee's motion for sanctions in the form of attorney's fees (Doc. 48) is DENIED; Defendant's counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel (Doc. 50) is MOOT as to Defendants McKee and Olsen and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant Goddard; Defendants' motion for a "gatekeeper" order (Doc. 13) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Defendants' motion to strike (Doc. 26) is DENIED; Plaintiff's motion for contempt or arrest (Doc. 35) is DENIED; and Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. 16) is DENIED. (Engle, Anita)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?