THACKURDEEN, ET AL. V. DUKE UNIVERSITY, ET AL.
ROSHNI THACKURDEEN and RAJ B. THACKURDEEN |
DUKE UNIVERSITY, ORGANIZATION FOR TROPICAL STUDIES, INC. and DOES |
1:2016cv01108 |
September 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
XX US, Outside State |
JOE L. WEBSTER |
N. C. TILLEY |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 03/23/2018, that Defendant Duke University's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. # 67 ] is DENIED IN PART in that this Court finds the parties were served within the tim e allotted and personal jurisdiction is established over each Defendant by the extension of time to serve and GRANTED IN PART in that Plaintiffs' claims for ( 1) Negligence and (2) Wrongful Death are barred by Waiver and Release. FURTHER that Defendant Organization for Tropical Studies' Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, For a Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. # 71 ] is DENIED IN PART in that this Court finds the parties were served within the time allotted and personal ju risdiction is established over each Defendant by the extension of time to serve and GRANTED IN PART in that Plaintiffs' claims for ( 1 ) Negligence and (2) Wrongful Death are barred by Waiver and Release. The Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress claim against both Defendants remains.(Taylor, Abby) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.