ASTANZA DESIGN, LLC. V. GIEMME STILE, S.P.A., ET AL.
| ASTANZA DESIGN, LLC |
| GIEMME STILE S.P.A. and GIEMME USA, LLC |
| 1:2016cv01238 |
| October 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Guilford |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| THOMAS D. SCHROEDER |
| Other Contract |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 12/15/2016, that Defendants' motion to vacate, modify, or correct the arbitration award (Doc. 11 ) is DENIED; that Astanza's amended motion to confirm the arbitration a ward (Doc. 3 ) is GRANTED and that the arbitration award is CONFIRMED; and that judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $165,803.61, plus 8 percent interest as of September 23 , 2016. FURTHER ORDERED that Astanza's request for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees is GRANTED insofar as it relates to its prosecution of its motion to confirm and its opposition to Defendants' motion to vacate, modify, or correct the arbitration award. Astanza shall file any application for attorneys' fees within sixty (60) days pursuant to the requirements of the applicable rules and law, including this court's local rules. L.R. 54.2. (Garland, Leah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
