WILLIAMS V. COLVIN
JULIUS LEE WILLIAMS |
CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
1:2017cv00016 |
January 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Durham |
L. PATRICK AULD |
LORETTA C. BIGGS |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 12/01/2017 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11 ) is DENIED, and that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 15 ) is GRANTED. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 09/14/2017, that Plaintiff's Motions to Supplement the Record (Docket Entries 18 , 19 ) are DENIED as moot. IT IS THEREFOR E RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be affirmed, that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 11 ) be denied, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 15 ) be granted, and that judgment be entered for Defendant. (Garland, Leah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.