MOBLEY v. FOSTER et al
JASON DARNELL MOBLEY |
ANGELA C. FOSTER, AMANDA FIELDS, BANITA BAKER, DONNA MICHELLE WRIGHT, CAROLE SMITH, ANGELIQUE HAMLET, ROBERT STONE and GUILFORD COUNTY GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE |
1:2017cv00117 |
February 10, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Guilford |
L. PATRICK AULD |
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 04/20/2017, that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Docket Entry 1 ) is GRANTED for the limited purpose of considering this recommendation of dismissal. RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's federal claim(s) against Guilford County General Court of Justice be dismissed with prejudice. RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's claim(s) against Judge Foster in bo th her official and individual capacity be dismissed with prejudice. RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's official capacity federal claim(s) against Trial Defendants be dismissed with prejudice. RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's individual capacity federal claim(s) against Trial Defendants be dismissed without prejudice. RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's state-law claims be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). (Garland, Leah) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.