WELTON v. DURHAM COUNTY et al
| MARQUETA WELTON |
| DURHAM COUNTY, DURHAM COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, WENDELL DAVIS and KATHY EVERETT-PERRY |
| 1:2017cv00258 |
| March 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Durham |
| CATHERINE C. EAGLES |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 09/27/2018, the defendants motion for summary judgment, Doc. 55 , is GRANTED. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 08/28/2017, that the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Wendell Davis in his individual capacity, Doc. 11 , is GRANTED. The motion to dismiss filed by the remaining defendants and Mr. Davis in his official capacity, Doc. 13 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: a. The motion is DENIED as to the Title VII retaliation claim against Durham County; b. The motion is otherwise GRANTED. c. All claims against the individual defendants and the Board of County Commissioners are DISMISSED. d. All claims against Durham County are DISMISSED except for the Title VII retaliation claim, which may proceed.(Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
