STEPHENSON v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION/NELNET
| KIMBERLY DAWN STEPHENSON |
| KIMBERLY DAWN STEPHENSON |
| DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION/NELNET |
| WILLIAM P. MILLER and ROBERT E. PRICE, JR. |
| SARA A. CONTI |
| 1:2017cv00262 |
| March 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Guilford |
| LORETTA C. BIGGS |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 03/28/2018, that the orders of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, (ECF Nos. 5 -17; 5 -21), are AFFIRMED. FURTHER that Appellant's M otion to Strike Request to Close Case, (ECF No. 26 ), is GRANTED. The Court will consider the Request to Close Case, (ECF No. 25 ), withdrawn. FURTHER that Appellant's Motion to Strike, (ECF No. 28 ), is GRANTED. The Court will consider wit hdrawn the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (ECF No. 8 ), the Motion to Pay Filing Fee in Installments, (ECF No. 22 ), and the Amended Motion to Make Payments, (ECF No. 23 ). FURTHER that the following motions filed by Appellant ar e DENIED as moot: Motion per Rule 24(c), (ECF No. 9 ), Motion Per 28 U.S.C. § 753(f), (ECFNo. 11 ), and Second Motion to Strike Request to Close Case, (ECF No. 27 ). FURTHER that Appellant's Motion to Supplement the Appellate Record, (ECF No. 19 ), is DENIED. (Garland, Leah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
