FLYTHE v. BERRYHILL
| JOSEPH WILLIAM FLYTHE |
| NANCY A. BERRYHILL and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2017cv00591 |
| June 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Randolph |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| N. C. TILLEY |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR. on 6/3/2019. For the reasons explained in this Memorandum Opinion, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ADOPTED and the Commis sioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Reversing Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (Doc. # 10 ) is DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. # 12 ) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Daniel, J)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 9/20/2018; that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be affirmed, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Reversing Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (Docket Entry 10 ) be denied, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 12 ) be granted, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
