DOE v. DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
| JOHN DOE |
| DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, CARL HARRIS, ED.D., NATHAN HESTER, LETICIA JUDD and GINA WATRING |
| 1:2017cv00773 |
| August 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Durham |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| THOMAS D. SCHROEDER |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 1/25/2019. For the reasons stated, Doe's motion to dismiss (Doc. 11 ) is GRANTED and all claims against Defendants Judd, Hester, and Ha rris in their official and individual capacities are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER that Doe's motion to amend the complaint (Doc. 23 ) is DENIED as futile as to the claims against Defendants Judd and Hester; Doe's motion to amend is otherwise GRANTED, as no Defendant has opposed amendment as they affect the remaining claims. (Daniel, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
