WATSON v. MCPHATTER et al
Plaintiff: TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant: MCPHATTER, ALTIZER and LUDEMANN
Case Number: 1:2017cv00934
Filed: October 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Guilford
Presiding Judge: L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge: LORETTA C. BIGGS
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 195 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to TRAVIS L. WATSON,signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 4/22/22, that the instant Motion (Docket Entry 153 ) is DENIED IN PART AND DEFERRED IN PART, in that Plaintiffs request for recusal of the undersigned Magistrate Judge is denied and Plaintiffs request for recusal of Judge Biggs is deferred. (Butler, Carol)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 142 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 02/11/2022, that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket Entry 83 ) and his Counsel Request (Docket Entry 127 ) are DENIED.(Taylor, Abby)
June 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 6/8/2021 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 58 ; that Detective Altizer's Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 51 ), is DENIED. (Sheets, Jamie)
February 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD signed on 2/1/2021. RECOMMENDED that Detective Altizer's Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 51 ) be denied. (Daniel, J)
June 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD signed on 6/23/2020. RECOMMENDED that the Summary Judgment Motion (Docket Entry 33 ) be granted in part and denied in part as follows: summary judgment be granted as to Detective McPhatter and Detective Ludemann, but denied as to Detective Altizer on Plaintiff's fourth-amendment claim for illegal searches of his mail. (Daniel, J)
January 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD signed on 1/29/2019. RECOMMENDED that the Dismissal Motion (Docket Entry 12 ) be denied. (Daniel, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WATSON v. MCPHATTER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TRAVIS L. WATSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MCPHATTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALTIZER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LUDEMANN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?