ROSS v. BERRYHILL
TARA D. ROSS |
NANCY A. BERRYHILL |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
1:2017cv01145 |
December 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Cabarrus |
L. PATRICK AULD |
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER |
Disability Insurance |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 03/29/2019 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, that Plaintiff's Motio n for a Judgment Reversing or Modifying the Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, or Remanding the Cause for a Rehearing (Doc. 7 ) is DENIED, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 9 ) is GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD signed on 2/27/2019. RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be affirmed, that Plaintiff' s Motion for a Judgment Reversing or Modifying the Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, or Remanding the Cause for a Rehearing (Docket Entry 7 ) be denied, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 9 ) be granted, and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. (Daniel, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.