MUMFORD v. THOMAS et al
PAUL MUMFORD |
JASON S. THOMAS and BOB SCHURMEIER |
1:2018cv00083 |
February 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
XX US, Outside State |
UNASSIGNED |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 1/18/2019. RECOMMENDED that Defendant Schurmeier's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 14 ) be gra nted as to Plaintiff's claim for damages against Schurmeier in his official capacity, but denied otherwise, so that Plaintiff's claims (1) against Schurmeier in his individual capacity and (2) for injunctive relief against Schurmeier in h is official capacity, would proceed, without prejudice to further consideration on future dispositive motions. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Defendant Thomas's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 17 ) be denied, and that Plaintiff's claims against Defen dant Thomas proceed at this stage, without prejudice to further consideration on future dispositive motions. It is ORDERED that this case is placed on a Standard Discovery Track, with a deadline for the completion of all discovery of May 17, 2019, and with dispositive motions due on June 17, 2019. (Daniel, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.