ROBINSON v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al
Plaintiff: DOROTHEA ROBINSON
Defendant: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, SCOTT SPILLMANN, M.D. and CANDY WRIGHT
Case Number: 1:2018cv00133
Filed: February 23, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Guilford
Presiding Judge: L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM L. OSTEEN
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. on 3/1/2019. Defendant Scott Spillmann's Answer with Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 31 ) is DENIED AS MOOT, in light of the amended document filed b y Defendant Spillmann. (See Doc. 38 ). FURTHER that Defendant Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 28 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, in that Defendant P&G's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 wrongful termination claims, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143422.2 claim, and civil conspiracy claim is GRANTED, and Defendant P&G's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 pay disparity and retaliation claims is DENIED. FURTHER that Defendant Candy Wright's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 33 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, in that Defendant Wright's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's defamation and civil conspiracy claims is GRANTED, and Defendant Wright's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's tortious interference with contract claim is DENIED. FURTHER that Defendant Scott Spillmann's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 38 ) is GRANTED. (Daniel, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROBINSON v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DOROTHEA ROBINSON
Represented By: ANGELA NEWELL GRAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Represented By: MELISSA ROBIN DAVIS
Represented By: CAITLIN M. GOFORTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCOTT SPILLMANN, M.D.
Represented By: PERRY C. HENSON, JR.
Represented By: NICOLE R. SCALLON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CANDY WRIGHT
Represented By: MELISSA ROBIN DAVIS
Represented By: CAITLIN M. GOFORTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?