MARTIN v. BERRYHILL
| AIOFIMI S. MARTIN |
| NANCY A. BERRYHILL |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2018cv00161 |
| March 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Hoke |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 9/11/2019; that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 16 ), is ADOPTED. FURTHER that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Reversing or Modifying the Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security or Remanding the Cause for a Rehearing, (Doc. 11 ), is DENIED, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, (Doc. 13 ), is GRANTED, that the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION, signed by Magistrate Judge L. Patrick Auld on 08/07/2019, that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be affirmed, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Reversing or Modifying the Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 11 be denied, and Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 13 be granted, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
