STARR v. TIWARI et al
Plaintiff: JAMIE STARR
Defendant: SATYA TIWARI, SATYA TIWARI - SURYA, INC. and ALLEN PARKER
Case Number: 1:2018cv00219
Filed: March 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: JOE L. WEBSTER
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM L. OSTEEN
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 2/27/2019, that for the foregoing reasons, this court finds that Defendants' motion to dismiss should be granted and Plaintiff's clai ms should be dismissed with prejudice. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint, (Doc. 15 ), is GRANTED. FURTHER that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, (Doc. 17 ), Motion for Jury Trial, (Doc. 20 ), and Motion for the Court to Grant Recovery, (Doc. 31 ), are construed as motions to amend the complaint and are DENIED. FURTHER that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Breech [sic] of Contract, (Doc. 24 ), and Motion to Amend Complaint, (Doc. 26 ), are DENIED. FURTHER tha t Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Breach of Contract Request, (Doc. 34 ), is construed as a motion to add a defendant and is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Add Party, (Doc. 36 ), is DENIED. FURTHER that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (6), (Doc. 11 ), is GRANTED. FURTHER that the claims contained in the Complaint, (Doc. 2 ], and the Amended Complaint, (Doc. 15 ), are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). FURTHER that Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order, (Doc. 18 ), Motion to Dismiss IIED Complaint, (Doc. 21 ), and Motion for a Pre-Filing Injunction, (Doc. 40 ), are DENIED AS MOOT. FURTHER that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel with Sanctions, (Doc. 25 ), Sealed Motion for Exam Report and Treatment, (Doc. 30 ), and Motion to Subpoena, (Doc. 38 ), are DENIED AS MOOT. As no further claims remain in this matter, a judgment shall be entered contemporaneously herewith for Defendants dismissing Plaintiffs claims with prejudice.(Butler, Carol)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STARR v. TIWARI et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMIE STARR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SATYA TIWARI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SATYA TIWARI - SURYA, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALLEN PARKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?