DEHOLL V. ECKERD CORPORATION, ET AL.
| CHRISTOPHER J. DEHOLL |
| ECKERD CORPORATION, RITE AID OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. and GREGORY SCOTT NORMAN |
| 1:2018cv00280 |
| April 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Alamance |
| JOE L. WEBSTER |
| N. C. TILLEY |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 7/25/2019, that Plaintiff Christopher J. DeHoll's and Defendants Eckerd Corporation and Gregory Scott Norman's Joint Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement and Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice [Doc. # 30 ] is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.(Butler, Carol)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR on 10/30/2018, that for the reasons stated above, ORDERED that Defendant Rite Aid of North Carolina's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction [Doc. # 9 ] is DENIED. FURTHER that Defendants Eckerd Corporation d/b/a Rite Aid Pharmacy's and Gregory Scott Norman's Joint Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. # 14 ] is DENIED IN PART, as to Plaintiff's Fair Labor Standard Act claims, and GRANTED IN PART, as to Plaintiff's North Carolina Wage and Hour Act claims. (Butler, Carol)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
