ULTRA-MEK, INC. v. UNITED FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
| ULTRA-MEK, INC. |
| UNITED FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. and OISEYS INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
| OISEYS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and UNITED FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. |
| ULTRA-MEK, INC. |
| 1:2018cv00281 |
| April 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Davidson |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
243
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. on 8/17/2022; that Defendants' Renewed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Literal Infringement, (Doc. 237 ), is GRANTED. (Hicks, Samantha)
|
|
Filing
234
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 6/2/2022; this court construes the "opposed first and second ends" claim limitation as "the lengthwise extremities of the [power act uating unit/actuating unit/linear actuating unit], wherein length is defined by the axis in which the [power actuating unit/actuating unit/linear actuating unit] moves forwardly and rearwardly." Within five days of the issuance of this Order, th e parties shall meet and confer to discuss whether in light of this adopted construction there is a need for additional expert reports, expert disclosures, and summary judgment briefing. If so, the parties shall set deadlines to complete this work, including any responsive briefing, by July 11, 2022. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing
174
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 3/30/2021; that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 142 ), is DENIED. FURTHER that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 134 ), is DENIED. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 9/26/2019. For the reasons set forth herein, this court construes the four sets of disputed claim terms as described above. FURTHER that the parties' Joint Motion for Hearing on Claim Construction, (Doc. 90 ), is DENIED AS MOOT. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
