GABRIEL v. FORSYTH COUNTY CLERK OF COURT MS. SUSAN FRYE OFFICE OF THE 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT et al
| CHARLES GABRIEL |
| FORSYTH COUNTY CLERK OF COURT MS. SUSAN FRYE OFFICE OF THE 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, HOLLEY ROBINSON, STATEBRIDGE COMPANY LLC, BROUGHAM REO OWNER, LP, JOHN A. MANDULAK, HUTCHENS LAW FIRM and SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE SERVICES INC. |
| 1:2018cv00354 |
| April 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| THOMAS D. SCHROEDER |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 1/8/2019. The motions to dismiss by the Lender Defendants (Doc. 4 ) and the Trustee Defendants (Doc. 6 ) are GRANTED, and Gabriel's cl aims against these Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE except for those claims over which the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER that Gabriel's motion for extension of time to serve (Doc. 31 ) is GRANTED and Gabriel shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to serve the State Defendants, the State Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 27 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to its later consideration, Gabriel's motion to amend (Doc. 18 ) is DENIED. (Daniel, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
