PONTUSSON v. SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. et al
| CLIVE PONTUSSON |
| SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY and REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC. |
| 1:2018cv00594 |
| July 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Forsyth |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC., RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. (Attachments: #1 Summons to Reynolds American Inc., #2 Summons to RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2382952.), filed by Clive Pontusson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(RHINE, JOEL) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Garland, Leah) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Garland, Leah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
