ATKINS v. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER RAY ATKINS
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 1:2018cv00677
Filed: August 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Rockingham
Presiding Judge: THOMAS D SCHROEDER
Referring Judge: JOE L WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2018 CASE REFERRED to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER RE: #4 Order. (Engle, Anita)
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 09/04/2018. Plaintiff shall prepare and deliver to the Clerk, the correct summons for service on each defendant. The Clerk shall send Plaintiff a blank summons along with a copy of this order. Plaintiff's failure to prepare and deliver said summons within 15 days from the filing of this order shall result in this case being dismissed without further notice. The U.S. Marshal shall serve the summons and complaint upon defendant. (Coyne, Michelle)
August 28, 2018 CASE REFERRED RE: #3 Order on Motion for Application to Proceed IFP to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Marsh, Keah)
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 08/06/2018 that plaintiff is permitted to commence said proceeding in this Court without prepayment of fees or costs, or giving security therefor. Plaintiff is responsible for preparing and delivering to the Clerk, the correct summons for service on each defendant. Failure to prepare and deliver said summons within 15 days from filing of this order shall result in this case being dismissed without further notice. Plaintiff is responsible for service of the compliant and summons upon defendant. (Coyne, Michelle)
August 3, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by CHRISTOPHER RAY ATKINS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit)(Coyne, Michelle)
August 3, 2018 Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by CHRISTOPHER RAY ATKINS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Coyne, Michelle)
August 3, 2018 Motion Referred to Magistrate Judge Joe L. Webster RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP. (Coyne, Michelle)
August 3, 2018 Case ASSIGNED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. Set flag for Magistrate Judge Joe L. Webster. (Coyne, Michelle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ATKINS v. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER RAY ATKINS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?