WHERRY v. TRANS AM FACTORING SERVICE, ET AL.
| BENJAMIN J. WHERRY |
| CRISTAL MIRANDA BILINGUAL RELATIONSHIP SPECIALIST, DJ CROCKER RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR FOR TAFS and TRANS AM FACTORING SERVICE |
| 1:2018cv00733 |
| August 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT entitled "Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief to Desist Defendant's From Further Irreparable Injury" against CRISTAL MIRANDA BILINGUAL RELATIONSHIP SPECIALIST, DJ CROCKER RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR FOR TAFS, TRANS AM FACTORING SERVICE, filed by BENJAMIN J. WHERRY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N)(Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by BENJAMIN J. WHERRY. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Motion Referred to Magistrate Judge Joi Elizabeth Peake RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Case ASSIGNED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. Set flag for Magistrate Judge Joi Elizabeth Peake. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
