SLOOP et al v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC
TIMOTHY SLOOP and TERESA SLOOP |
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC |
1:2018cv00775 |
September 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
JOE L WEBSTER |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC. (ESSER, WILLIAM) |
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC. Answer due by 11/15/2018. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 10/02/2018. (Brubaker, John) |
Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by TIMOTHY SLOOP, TERESA SLOOP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(EDWARDS, ASA) Modified on 9/11/2018 to reflect filing fee paid. Receipt number: 04182424281.(Butler, Carol) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney ASA C. EDWARDS, IV on behalf of Plaintiffs TERESA SLOOP, TIMOTHY SLOOP (EDWARDS, ASA) |
Case ASSIGNED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. Set flag for Magistrate Judge Joe L. Webster. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.