PROGRESSIVE SOUTHEASTERN INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: PROGRESSIVE SOUTHEASTERN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 1:2018cv00844
Filed: October 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: L PATRICK AULD
Referring Judge: LORETTA C BIGGS
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2018 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Joint Motion for Substitution of the United States of America as Defendant. The Clerk shall amend the caption to reflect the substitution of the United States of America as Defendant in place of the Department of the Army. Issued by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 11/28/2018. (AULD, L.)
November 28, 2018 Motion Referred: RE: #6 Joint MOTION to Substitute , to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Blay, Debbie)
November 27, 2018 Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Substitute by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Response to Motion due by 12/18/2018 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(CHILDS, JOAN)
October 30, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney JOAN BRODISH CHILDS on behalf of Defendant DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (CHILDS, JOAN)
October 10, 2018 Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Coyne, Michelle)
October 10, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USAG, #2 AUSA)(Coyne, Michelle)
October 4, 2018 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed pursuant to FRCP 7.1(a) by Plaintiff PROGRESSIVE SOUTHEASTERN INSURANCE COMPANY (MILLS, ERNEST)
October 4, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, THE ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2437895.), filed by PROGRESSIVE SOUTHEASTERN INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MILLS, ERNEST)
October 4, 2018 CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Garland, Leah)
October 4, 2018 Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Garland, Leah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PROGRESSIVE SOUTHEASTERN INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Represented By: JOAN BRODISH CHILDS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: JOAN BRODISH CHILDS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PROGRESSIVE SOUTHEASTERN INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: ERNEST ALLEN MILLS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?