DAVIE v. BERRYHILL
WILLIAM DAVIE |
NANCY A. BERRYHILL |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
1:2018cv00930 |
November 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
LORETTA C BIGGS |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Notice of Right to Consent - SSA. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to NANCY A. BERRYHILL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 SSA, #2 AUSA)(Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Joi Elizabeth Peake on 11/28/2018, that good cause exists to allow Plaintiff to proceed without payment of costs and fees in this matter. Plaintiff is permitted to proceed in this action in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Plaintiff is responsible for preparing and serving the Complaint and Summons upon the Defendant. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Motion Referred to Magistrate Judge Joi Elizabeth Peake RE: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by WILLIAM DAVIE.(LAUFFER, DANIEL) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by WILLIAM DAVIE. (LAUFFER, DANIEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.