WILLIAMS v. PEGASUS RESIDENTIAL, LLC et al
| VALERIE WILLIAMS |
| PEGASUS RESIDENTIAL, LLC, MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC and INWOOD HOLDINGS, LLC |
| 1:2018cv01030 |
| December 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
MEMORANDUM filed by Plaintiff VALERIE WILLIAMS re #25 MOTION for 26(f) Conference in Support of the Motion filed by VALERIE WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Email Chain regarding 26(f) Conference)(HARRIS, SCOTT)
|
|
Filing 25
MOTION for 26(f) Conference by VALERIE WILLIAMS. Responses due by 3/6/2019 (HARRIS, SCOTT)
|
|
Filing 24
Amended BRIEF re #22 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC filed by MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC. (MEDFORD, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 23
BRIEF re #22 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC filed by MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC. (MEDFORD, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 22
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC. Response to Motion due by 2/19/2019 (MEDFORD, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 21
Defendant Pegasus Residential, LLC's BRIEF re #20 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (ROSS, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 20
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by PEGASUS RESIDENTIAL, LLC. Response to Motion due by 2/19/2019 (ROSS, MICHAEL)
|
|
Answer updated for MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC to 1/28/2019; PEGASUS RESIDENTIAL, LLC to 1/28/2019. (Butler, Carol)
|
|
TEXT ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC, PEGASUS RESIDENTIAL, LLC. For good cause shown, Defendants MP Bridges at Southpoint, LLC d/b/a Bridges at Southpoint and Pegasus Residential, LLC shall have up to and including January 28, 2019 within which to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Issued by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 1/15/2019.(Lee, Pedra)
|
|
Filing 19
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order)(MEDFORD, MICHAEL)
|
|
Motion Referred: RE: #19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Blay, Debbie)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal as to party(s) INWOOD HOLDINGS, LLC, filed by Plaintiff VALERIE WILLIAMS (GWALTNEY, KARL)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney MATTHEW R. ROSENKOFF on behalf of Defendant PEGASUS RESIDENTIAL, LLC (ROSENKOFF, MATTHEW)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney MICHAEL ERIC ROSS on behalf of Defendant PEGASUS RESIDENTIAL, LLC (ROSS, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 15
Corporate Disclosure Statement by VALERIE WILLIAMS. (HARRIS, SCOTT)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney SCOTT C. HARRIS on behalf of Plaintiff VALERIE WILLIAMS (HARRIS, SCOTT)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney PATRICK M. WALLACE on behalf of Plaintiff VALERIE WILLIAMS (WALLACE, PATRICK)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney EDWARD H. MAGINNIS on behalf of Plaintiff VALERIE WILLIAMS (MAGINNIS, EDWARD)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney KARL S. GWALTNEY on behalf of Plaintiff VALERIE WILLIAMS (GWALTNEY, KARL)
|
|
Filing 10
Corporate Disclosure Statement by MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC identifying Corporate Parent McDowell Durham, LLC for MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC.. (MEDFORD, MICHAEL)
|
|
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
|
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for All Defendants. Answer due by 1/17/2019. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 12/19/2018. (Brubaker, John)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney WILLIAM SUTTON CHERRY, III on behalf of Defendant MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC (CHERRY, WILLIAM)
|
|
Filing 8
PETITION FOR REMOVAL Consent to Removal against VALERIE WILLIAMS, filed by MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC.(MEDFORD, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney MICHAEL T. MEDFORD on behalf of Defendant MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC (MEDFORD, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to PEGASUS RESIDENTAL, LLC. (Original document issued in Durham County Superior Court, Case Number 18CV4034 and is listed as Exhibit A to the Petition for Removal) (Coyne, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 4
COMPLAINT against INWOOD HOLDINGS, LLC, MP BRIDGES AT SOUTHPOINT, LLC, PEGASUS RESIDENTAL, LLC, filed by VALERIE WILLIAMS. (Original document filed in Durham County Superior Court, Case number 18CVS4034 and is listed as exhibit A to the Petition for Removal)(Coyne, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 3
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by PEGASUS RESIDENTAL, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(AUSBURN, DEBORAH)
|
|
Filing 2
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed pursuant to FRCP 7.1(a) by Defendant PEGASUS RESIDENTAL, LLC. (AUSBURN, DEBORAH)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REMOVAL against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2479468.), filed by PEGASUS RESIDENTAL, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (State Court Summons and Complaint), #2 Exhibit B (Declaration of Lindy Ware), #3 Exhibit C (Notice to State Court), #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(AUSBURN, DEBORAH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
