HAMPTON-BEY v. CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
| JON'TA TOMORREEA HAMPTON-BEY |
| GARY GACEK and CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| 1:2019cv00009 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| N C TILLEY |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28:1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #5 Affidavit. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of JON'TA HAMPTON-BEY re #2 Complaint filed by Plaintiff JON'TA TOMORREEA HAMPTON-BEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Coyne, Michelle) |
| Motion Referred to Magistrate Judge L. Patrick Auld RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR and MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Signed Pro Se Electronic Service Consent by JON'TA TOMORREEA HAMPTON-BEY, INDIGENOUSMOORS1982@GMAIL.COM (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, GARY GACEK, filed by JON'TA TOMORREEA HAMPTON-BEY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by JON'TA TOMORREEA HAMPTON-BEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Coyne, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
