MCNEAL v. HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY et al
| WILLIE MCNEAL, JR. |
| R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, LORILLARD LLC and HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY |
| 1:2019cv00097 |
| January 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE as to HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY served on 2/27/2019, answer due 3/20/2019; R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY served on 2/25/2019, answer due 3/18/2019. (PRZYBYSZ, ERIC) |
| Filing 10 Summons issued as to HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY, R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 H&V)(Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 9 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants, filed by WILLIE MCNEAL, JR.(BLACK, JANET WARD) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY, LORILLARD LLC, R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(BURKHALTER, HOWELL) |
| TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Motion and concludes that good cause exists to allow leave to amend the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file the Amended Complaint attached as Exhibit A to the Motion within five days of the date of this Order. Issued by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 2/19/2019.(Lee, Pedra) |
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY. Answer due by 3/21/2019. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 02/19/2019. (Brubaker, John)
|
| Motions Referred: RE: #6 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER (Sanders, Marlene) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM filed by Plaintiff WILLIE MCNEAL, JR re #6 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by WILLIE MCNEAL, JR. (BLACK, JANET WARD) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint by WILLIE MCNEAL, JR. Response to Motion due by 3/11/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Redlined Complaint)(BLACK, JANET WARD) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE as to All Defendants. HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY served on 02/01/2019, Answer due 02/22/2019, LORILLARD LLC and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY served 01/28/2019, Answer due 02/19/2019. (BLACK, JANET WARD) Modified on 2/6/2019 to include dates.(Taylor, Abby). |
| Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY, LORILLARD LLC, and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 2 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. (Sanders, Marlene) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2495017.), filed by WILLIE MCNEAL, JR.(BLACK, JANET WARD) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
