ROBINSON v. COOPER
Petitioner: COREY SPENCER ROBINSON
Respondent: ROY A. COOPER, III
Case Number: 1:2019cv00241
Filed: February 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: L PATRICK AULD
Referring Judge: CATHERINE C EAGLES
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER AND JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 4/8/2019 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation #3 ; that this action is filed and then DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to the petitioner filing a new petition which corrects the defects of the current Petition. (Sheets, Jamie)
April 4, 2019 CASE REFERRED RE: #3 RECOMMENDED RULING re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by COREY SPENCER ROBINSON., #5 Objection to Recommended Ruling to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. (Sanders, Marlene)
April 3, 2019 CASE REFERRED RE: #3 RECOMMENDED RULING re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by COREY SPENCER ROBINSON and #5 Objection to Recommended Ruling to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Sanders, Marlene)
March 25, 2019 Filing 5 OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #3 Recommended Ruling - Magistrate Judge, filed by Petitioner COREY SPENCER ROBINSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Sheets, Jamie)
March 7, 2019 Filing 4 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 3/21/2019. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 3/25/2019. (Butler, Carol)
March 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION, as to COREY SPENCER ROBINSON, signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 3/7/2019. ORDERED that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Petitioner 2254 forms, instructions, and a current application to proceed in forma pauperis. RECOMMENDED that this action be filed, but then dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition which corrects the defects of the current Petition. (Butler, Carol)
March 7, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #1 Motion for Application to Proceed IFP. Signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 3/11/2019. See #3 .(Butler, Carol)
March 4, 2019 CASE REFERRED for Screening (Butler, Carol)
February 27, 2019 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by COREY SPENCER ROBINSON. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope - Front and Back)(Butler, Carol)
February 27, 2019 Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by COREY SPENCER ROBINSON. (Butler, Carol)
February 27, 2019 Case Assigned to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Butler, Carol)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROBINSON v. COOPER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: COREY SPENCER ROBINSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ROY A. COOPER, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?