BOWDEN v. CLAY
Petitioner: MICHAEL EUGENE BOWDEN
Respondent: HARVEY CLAY
Case Number: 1:2019cv00634
Filed: June 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM L OSTEEN
Referring Judge: JOE L WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER as to MICHAEL EUGENE BOWDEN, signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 8/19/2019, that Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Respondent shall file an answer with this Court, pursuant to Rules 4 and 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, within 40 days of the issue of this Order. (Butler, Carol)
August 19, 2019 Set Deadlines: Responses due by 9/28/2019. (Butler, Carol)
August 19, 2019 CASE REFERRED RE: #6 Order, MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Butler, Carol)
July 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER as to MICHAEL EUGENE BOWDEN, signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 7/5/2019, that Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Respondent shall file an answer with this Court, pursuant to Rules 4 and 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, within 40 days of the issue of this Order. (Butler, Carol)
July 5, 2019 Set Deadlines: Responses due by 8/14/2019. (Butler, Carol)
June 27, 2019 CASE REFERRED for Screening (Butler, Carol)
June 26, 2019 Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of North Carolina Eastern; Case Number 5:19-hc-02188. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - It is ORDERED that the entire record in this matter is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, the district within which the state court convicted and sentenced petitioner, for all further proceedings. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 6/26/2019. Copy sent via US Mail to petitioner at Lumberton Correctional. (Indig, A.) [Transferred from North Carolina Eastern on 6/26/2019.]
June 26, 2019 Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Garland, Leah)
June 25, 2019 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Michael Eugene Bowden. (Indig, A.) [Transferred from North Carolina Eastern on 6/26/2019.]
June 25, 2019 Filing 2 INCOMPLETE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Eugene Bowden. (Indig, A.) [Transferred from North Carolina Eastern on 6/26/2019.]
June 25, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Eugene Bowden. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (Indig, A.) [Transferred from North Carolina Eastern on 6/26/2019.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOWDEN v. CLAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MICHAEL EUGENE BOWDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: HARVEY CLAY
Represented By: CLARENCE JOE DELFORGE, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?