LEAK v. GREENWOOD et al
| BRADLEY LEAK |
| SGT. WADE, OFFICER GREENWOOD and MR. MARION |
| 1:2019cv00678 |
| July 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by BRADLEY LEAK. Address updated on docket sheet. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by BRADLEY LEAK. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to #4 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff BRADLEY LEAK. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against GREENWOOD, MARION, filed by BRADLEY LEAK. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by BRADLEY LEAK. (Garland, Leah) |
| Case ASSIGNED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Garland, Leah) |
| CASE REFERRED for Screening. (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BRADLEY LEAK. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by BRADLEY LEAK. (Garland, Leah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
