LLOYD v. USP LEE
Petitioner: ANTWAN O'BRIAN LLOYD
Respondent: USP LEE
Case Number: 1:2019cv00682
Filed: July 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: L PATRICK AULD
Referring Judge: WILLIAM L OSTEEN
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2019 Filing 5 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 8/2/2019. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 8/5/2019. (Butler, Carol)
July 19, 2019 Filing 4 RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER as to ANTWAN O'BRIAN LLOYD, Signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 7/19/2019. ORDERED that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation and that the Clerk return the $5.00 filing fee to Petitioner. FURTHER that Petitioner's Motions (Docket Entries #2 , #3 ) are denied as moot. FURTHER that the Clerk send Petitioner a copy of this Recommendation and instruction forms for filing 2255 motions in this Court and Motions for Authorization in the court of appeals, and five copies of 2255 motion forms (more opies will be sent on request). Petitioner may use one set of forms to file any 2255 in this Court challenging his revocation sentence. As for the others, Petitioner should use them to seek permission from the Fourth Circuit to raise any challenges to his original conviction or sentence and should keep the original and two copies of the 2255 motion which can be submitted in this Court if Petitioner obtains approval from the Fourth Circuit. RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and then dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner raising his claim challenging the computation of his sentence in his district of incarceration, bringing his claim challenging his revocation sentence in a 2255 motion in this Court, and/or pursuing his claim attacking his original conviction and sentence by seeking certification for a second or successive 2255 motion through a Motion for Authorization in the court of appeals as required by 28 U.S.C. 2255 and 2244 and Fourth Circuit Local Rule 22(d). (Butler, Carol)
July 19, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying #3 Motion to Amend, in forma pauperis status is granted. Signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 7/19/2019. See #4 .(Butler, Carol)
July 16, 2019 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number NCM046620. (Butler, Carol)
July 15, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by ANTWAN O'BRIAN LLOYD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Taylor, Abby)
July 11, 2019 CASE REFERRED for Screening (Butler, Carol)
July 5, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pursuant to 28: U.S.C. 2241), filed by ANTWAN O'BRIAN LLOYD. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope - Front and Back)(Butler, Carol)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LLOYD v. USP LEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ANTWAN O'BRIAN LLOYD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USP LEE
Represented By: ANGELA HEWLETT MILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?